Fortean Winds

Send us Fan Mail
In April 1989, five teenagers were accused of a brutal attack in New York's Central Park. The newspapers had a name for the supposed new phenomenon: wilding. The city had a new kind of danger to fear.
Thirteen years later, DNA evidence and another man's confession overturned the convictions.
The attack was real. The story built around it was wrong.
In the first installment of a new three-part Fortean Winds investigation into fear, RamX and Bones ask a deceptively simple question:
If crime has fallen so dramatically across much of the Western world, why do so many people believe society is becoming more dangerous?
The numbers tell a story that rarely makes the evening news.
Serial killers have declined dramatically since their peak decades. Vehicle theft was transformed by electronic immobilizers. Chicago's once-powerful gangs fragmented into smaller factions. Across the United States, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom, many traditional forms of crime have fallen from their historic highs.
But crime didn't simply disappear.
Fraud, cybercrime, identity theft and other forms of digital predation have changed the landscape. Some threats became less common. Others found new opportunities.
Then comes the question that changes the investigation:
Who benefits when falling crime is presented as a crime wave?
RamX and Bones examine Gallup polling showing dramatic partisan shifts in perceptions of crime, research into humanity's persistent belief that morality is declining, and an American Economic Review study demonstrating that television news exposure can measurably influence voting behavior.
From the Central Park Five to modern cable news, media ownership, political incentives and the aging electorate, this episode explores how real dangers can become manufactured narratives—and how those narratives can be used to demand power, money and public consent.
This isn't an argument that crime is imaginary. Victims are real. Violence is real. Fraud is real.
It's an investigation into the distance between what is happening and what we're being taught to fear.
The Vanishing Crime Wave is Part One of a three-part series.
Next: Religion. Then: Fear itself.
Who taught us what to fear?

How about some links?
Innocence Project — Central Park Jogger case and the five exonerations
Reason — Trump’s 1989 advertisement and the origins of “wilding”

Northeastern University — Why Are There Fewer Serial Killers?

Chicago Crime Commission — The Gang Book

WTTW — Chicago Gang Fragmentation and Social Media

UK Office for National Statistics — Crime in England and Wales, Year Ending March 2026

Gallup — Crime Seen as Less Serious for Second Straight Year (2025)

Mastroianni & Gilbert — The Illusion of Moral Decline, Nature (2023)

Martin & Yurukoglu — Bias in Cable News: Persuasion and Polarization, American Economic Review (2017)

Alliance for Securing Democracy — National Rally's Russian Bank Loan
Support the show
Read more and follow our sources to research paths of your own at Fortean Winds

Our UFO Research Summary.

Send us Fan Mail
Three cameras lose power at Skinwalker Ranch. A fourth reportedly records no visible perpetrator. Does the phenomenon react when we investigate it?
In this solo Fortean Winds Field Notes episode, RamX follows that question through John Keel’s research, the 1976 Tehran UFO intercept, and Project Hessdalen’s reported laser-response trials.
Then we get into the observer effect, quantum entanglement, plasma, and a possibility worth considering: what if the visible phenomenon is an interface?
Reaction isn’t recognition. The question is what an apparent response tracks—the energy we introduce, or the meaning of what we do.
Tell us your thoughts in the comments. What would distinguish a physical reaction from a meaningful response?
And how about some links?
Skinwalker Ranch — the camera incident
Published retrospective account of the July 19, 1998 surveillance-camera incident discussed in the episode. This is a NIDS-era account, rather than an independently audited analysis of the original footage.
https://www.hunttheskinwalker.com/all-news/chameleo
Skinwalker Ranch — investigative responsiveness and surveillance
Additional discussion of the investigators’ interpretation of apparent evasiveness, equipment interference, and the limitations of surveillance.
https://www.hunttheskinwalker.com/all-news/active-deception
John Keel — “Organized Harassment of Individuals”
Keel’s archive presents material from his 1968 dossier concerning reported interference involving UFO witnesses and researchers. The January archive includes entries discussing hoaxes and conflicting information.
https://www.johnkeel.com/?m=201401
John Keel — Special Investigations File
Additional archived material concerning telephone incidents, alleged impersonation of Air Force officers, and Keel’s assessment of a sighting report.
https://www.johnkeel.com/?p=2845
Tehran UFO intercept — September 19, 1976
NSA-hosted archival file containing a reproduction headed “Verbatim Wire Message,” describing the reported aircraft-system failures and civilian-airliner communications interference. The relevant material begins on the second PDF page. This is a reproduced military message, not the original military form.
https://www.nsa.gov/portals/75/documents/news-features/declassified-documents/ufo/us_gov_iran_case.pdf
Project Hessdalen — 1984 Final Technical Report
Erling Strand’s field-investigation report. Section 3.7 describes the laser trials; Section 4.5 discusses their interpretation; Section 4.7 discusses instrument failures. The reported eight responses occurred across nine trials during two sightings.
https://old.hessdalen.org/reports/hpreport84.shtml
Quantum physics — the 1998 which-way experiment
Dürr, S., Nonn, T., and Rempe, G. “Origin of quantum-mechanical complementarity probed by a ‘which-way’ experiment in an atom interferometer.” Nature 395, 33–37 (1998).
https://doi.org/10.1038/25653
Quantum measurement — the role of an observer
Sokolovski, D. “Quantum Measurements with, and Yet without an Observer.” Entropy 22, 1185 (2020). Additional background on measurement, physical records, and the distinction between an apparatus and conscious observation.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7597356/
Plasma — self-organization and collective behavior
Zhang, C., Huang, C.-K., and Joshi, C. “Self-organization of photoionized plasmas via kinetic instabilities” (2023 preprint). Discusses laboratory plasma structures and collective effects; it does not demonstrate plasma consciousness or establish an explanation for the anomalous cases.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16275
Support the show
Read more and follow our sources to research paths of your own at Fortean Winds

Our UFO Research Summary.

Send us Fan Mail
David Grusch is making claims that go considerably further than his original UAP testimony.
In his latest appearance with Joe Rogan, the former intelligence officer and UAP whistleblower discusses alleged recovered craft, multiple forms of non-human intelligence, underwater facilities, consciousness-based technology—and a reported encounter involving a seven-foot reptilian being that ended violently.
RamX and Bones work through the interview claim by claim.
Grusch distinguishes between physical and non-physical UAP, speculating that some luminous orbs could be “sentient plasmoids” while others might represent solid craft surrounded by plasma generated through magnetohydrodynamic propulsion. That lands remarkably close to the plasma problem explored in our recent Field Notes episode on Britain's Project Condign.
Then the interview gets stranger.
Grusch describes information concerning several alleged NHI morphologies: human-looking beings, multiple types of Greys, and large reptilian entities. He says recovered biological material has undergone genomic analysis, discusses apparent conflict between different NHI groups, and recounts testimony surrounding a crashed craft whose occupants allegedly survived the impact.
But throughout the episode, Fortean Winds keeps the evidentiary categories separate.
What did Grusch personally witness? What did he see in classified audiovisual material? What was reported to him by firsthand witnesses? And what is simply his own theory?
Those distinctions matter.
The conversation also moves into alleged underwater facilities, the Baltic Sea anomaly, Havana Syndrome, Stargate and remote viewing, and Grusch's theory that some recovered technology may require something closer to a consciousness interface than a conventional control system.
Several of these ideas unexpectedly intersect with subjects we've independently followed for years: Project Condign, John Keel's ultraterrestrial hypothesis, Jacques Vallée, electromagnetic effects, plasma, synchronicity and the recurring possibility that the phenomenon represents a spectrum rather than a single source.
That's corroboration of a pattern.
It isn't proof.
Because after reptilians, plasmoids, recovered bodies and secret programs, the problem remains exactly where it has always been:
Eventually, somebody has to wheel out the evidence.
How about some Links?
Rogan - Grusch Interview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYPXINFcvmI
Erik Davis
https://www.newsnationnow.com/space/ufo/4-types-aliens-ufo-whistleblower/

Havana Syndrome Fortean Winds
https://forteanwinds.com/2021/12/13/ufos-and-brain-damage-stranger-danger/

https://forteanwinds.com/2023/02/23/havana-syndrome-and-the-ufo-problem/

Support the show
Read more and follow our sources to research paths of your own at Fortean Winds

Our UFO Research Summary.

Send us Fan Mail
Welcome to Field Notes — shorter Fortean Winds investigations built around a single document, case, study or piece of research we think deserves attention.
For the first Field Note, RamX returns to Project Condign, the massive classified UAP study conducted for the UK's Ministry of Defence using thousands of sighting reports collected over decades.
The report contains an extraordinary sentence: “That UAP exist is indisputable.”
But its conclusions weren't crashed spacecraft or extraterrestrial visitors. The authors instead explored whether many UAP could represent poorly understood atmospheric plasma phenomena—charged formations capable of unusual movement, apparent shape changes and potentially even effects on human perception.
That leads into some of the strangest material in the report: correlations with meteor activity, electromagnetic effects, apparent triangular and cigar-shaped objects, possible neurological effects on witnesses, and speculation about whether some classic encounter experiences could originate in the interaction between unusual electromagnetic environments and the human brain.
RamX also looks at the famously redacted sections of Condign. Newly uncovered material complicates the assumption that those black bars concealed extraordinary discoveries: some apparently hid little more than unverified speculation about rumored classified aircraft.
None of that makes Condign a solved case. The report itself struggled to explain how the proposed plasma phenomena could remain coherent for the durations witnesses sometimes reported.
And that's precisely why it's worth revisiting.
The classified material may be less interesting than the science that wasn't classified at all.
Field Notes is where RamX and Bones can quickly share research we don't want sitting in a folder waiting for a full episode. Let us know if you'd like to hear more of them.
Check out our Condign Revisited article here: https://forteanwinds.com/2025/05/14/condign-revisited-a-quiet-disclosure-lost-in-the-noise/
Support the show
Read more and follow our sources to research paths of your own at Fortean Winds

Our UFO Research Summary.

Send us Fan Mail
Before recording this episode, RamX sat in on a briefing about a question the UAP community rarely asks:
If disclosure happens, how should you actually tell people?
The Sol Foundation's new disclosure study is using a nationally representative discrete-choice experiment to test how Americans respond to different messengers, evidence, verification methods and disclosure scenarios. The project comes as Sol leadership participates in the government's UAP Science Advisory Council and advocates a phased approach to disclosure. 
Then RamX and Bones return to two physical cases Fortean Winds has followed for years: the Nazca bodies and Colombia's Buga Sphere.
With the Nazca material, some specimens and claims have fallen apart under scrutiny. Others remain more difficult to explain. The episode looks at the independent forensic work, the unusual anatomy attributed to the specimen known as Maria, and the scientific testing that could move the case forward.
Then there's the Buga Sphere.
Claims surrounding the object include seamless construction, unusual internal structures, exotic materials, extreme age and mysterious surface symbols. Some observations deserve further investigation. Others don't survive basic scientific scrutiny—and several of the most dramatic claims still lack the independent laboratory work, documented methodology and chain of custody needed to establish them.
Across disclosure, Nazca and Buga, Fortean Winds keeps arriving at the same wall:
Who actually holds the evidence?
Scans, press conferences, testimony and extraordinary claims all come downstream from access. If physical evidence exists, independent researchers need to be allowed to examine it, replicate the findings and publish the data.
Don't get ahead of the evidence.
But don't stop following it either.
For further reading: Sol Foundation — How Will Americans Respond to UAP Disclosure? · Sol Foundation UAP policy and Science Advisory Council · Peer-reviewed Atacama genome study
Support the show
Read more and follow our sources to research paths of your own at Fortean Winds

Our UFO Research Summary.