Take Caution in Using LLMs as Human Surrogates: Scylla Ex Machina∗
This academic paper investigates the suitability of large language models (LLMs) as substitutes for human participants in social science research. The authors examine LLMs' reasoning abilities using the "11-20 money request game," a test designed to evaluate strategic thinking. Their findings consistently show that LLMs generally fail to replicate human behavioral patterns, exhibiting less reasoning depth and inconsistent responses compared to human subjects. The study highlights several limitations of LLMs, including their reliance on probabilistic patterns rather than genuine understanding, sensitivity to subtle changes in prompts or language, and the potential for memorization of training data to be mistaken for true reasoning. Ultimately, the paper concludes that caution is essential when considering LLMs as human surrogates, suggesting they are currently better suited for generating novel ideas rather than simulating human behavior.keepSave to notecopy_alldocsAdd noteaudio_magic_eraserAudio OverviewflowchartMind Maparrow_downwardJump to bottom
--------
27:43
The Logic of Machines: The AI Reasoning Debate
This paper explores the ongoing debate surrounding AI's capacity for genuine reasoning, questioning whether current systems truly think or merely exhibit advanced pattern recognition. It defines AI reasoning as simulating human cognitive processes like deduction and problem-solving, distinguishing it from generative AI and pattern matching. The document highlights the historical evolution of AI approaches, from symbolic systems to neural networks, and the emergence of hybrid models. Critically, it presents evidence from Apple's "Illusion of Thinking" research suggesting current AI models fail at high-complexity problems, pointing to fundamental limitations in their logical processing. Finally, it discusses future directions like Neural-Symbolic AI and underscores the crucial ethical, legal, and governance implications of developing increasingly capable AI.
--------
31:02
Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Models
This academic paper challenges the common belief that the final layers of large language models (LLMs) are the most effective for downstream tasks. The authors propose a new unified framework that integrates information theory, geometry, and invariance metrics to assess the quality of hidden layer representations. Their extensive experiments across various LLM architectures and even vision models demonstrate that intermediate layers often provide richer, more robust features, frequently outperforming the final layer in terms of accuracy on diverse tasks. The paper also explores how different architectures and training objectives influence these internal representation patterns, highlighting a "compression valley" in autoregressive models that appears crucial for balancing information and noise. Ultimately, this research advocates for a shift in focus toward strategically leveraging mid-layer representations for more accurate and robust AI systems.
--------
13:20
Causal Attribution Analysis for Continuous Outcomes
This paper introduces a novel approach to causal attribution analysis for continuous outcome variables, a significant departure from prior research primarily focused on binary outcomes. This new method proposes a series of posterior causal estimands, such as posterior intervention effects, posterior total causal effects, and posterior natural direct effects, to retrospectively evaluate multiple correlated causes of a continuous effect. The authors establish the identifiability of these estimands under specific assumptions, including sequential ignorability, monotonicity, and perfect positive rank, and outline a two-step estimation procedure. An artificial hypertension example and a real developmental toxicity dataset are utilized to illustrate the practical application of this framework, aiming to enhance the accuracy of causal conclusions in fields like medicine and policy analysis.
--------
18:02
Training a Generally Curious Agent
This academic paper introduces Paprika, a novel fine-tuning method designed to enhance the exploratory and decision-making capabilities of language models. Unlike traditional training, Paprika focuses on teaching models to adapt to new tasks by learning from synthetic interaction data, rather than through continuous gradient updates. The research emphasizes the importance of strategic information gathering for intelligent systems and proposes a curriculum learning strategy to improve the efficiency of sampling useful data. The authors suggest this approach offers a promising direction for AI systems capable of autonomously solving novel sequential decision-making problems that require interaction with the real world.
Men know other men best. Women know other women best.
And yes, perhaps AIs know other AIs best.
AI explains what you should know about this week's AI research progress.
New Zealand