The People’s Court Podcast

First, the plaintiff claims the defendant was with his ex-girlfriend and ran into the plaintiff's car during a fight. The plaintiff is suing for the damages. The defendant insists the plaintiff instigated the exchange by punching his car with his fist.

Then, the plaintiff went to the defendant's art gallery to get his friend's artwork. However, the plaintiff says the artwork was missing, so the plaintiff is suing for its value. The defendant argues he doesn't know who the plaintiff is, but the artist passed away, and the artwork sold.

Plus, the plaintiff claims the defendant, a car salesman, sold her a car. However, the vehicle is a lemon, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists he told the plaintiff she could exchange the car. In fact, the defendant says the plaintiff still owes money on the vehicle.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says the defendant, her accountant, made a mistake on her tax return. As a result, the plaintiff owes the IRS money on penalties and interest, so the plaintiff is suing the defendant. The defendant argues the plaintiff is suing for more than he owes. The defendant is countersuing for defamation of character.

Then, the plaintiff claims the defendant crashed into her car, so the plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant says the crash wasn't her fault because she drove over a patch of black ice.

Plus, the plaintiff hired the defendant to sand and restain the stairs. However, her stairs looked exactly the same after the job, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists he did a great job, but the stairs need to be fully replaced.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff has known the defendant for 30 years, and they were friends with benefits. The plaintiff moved in with the defendant and discovered her piggy bank was emptied. The plaintiff is suing for stolen money, an apartment deposit, rent, and storage. The defendant argues the plaintiff is only suing him out of spite, and he denies owing her anything.

Then, the plaintiff claims the defendant, her landlord, went into her apartment whenever she wanted. The plaintiff is suing for the return of her security deposit. The defendant argues the plaintiff left the apartment in deplorable condition.

Plus, the plaintiff has known the defendant for many years. The defendant ordered custom shirts from the plaintiff, but he hasn't paid in full, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists he already paid the plaintiff in full.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff purchased a parrot from the defendant. She claims the defendant put the bird in a box, but when she got home, the bird was missing. She says the defendant scammed her and only pretended to put the bird in the box, so she’s suing for her money back. The defendant argues she clips the birds’ wings so they can’t fly. She thinks the plaintiff lost the bird because the plaintiff saw her box up the animal.

Then, the plaintiff brings his great-aunt to court. He claims the defendant sold some of his personal belongings without his permission, so he’s suing for the amount of the belongings and rent. The defendant argues the plaintiff took his items when he moved out, and he’s only suing her to give her grief. She’s countersuing for pain and suffering.

Plus, the plaintiff purchased a car from the defendant. When she started driving away, she heard a knocking noise. Her mechanic told her the engine looked like it had caught on fire, so she’s suing the defendant for her money back. The defendant argues the plaintiff was aware of the noise when she bought it.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff and defendant were driving next to each other and got into an argument. He says the defendant threw a cup of coffee into his car, splashing on his teen son, then rammed into his side door and drove off. He’s suing for the car damages. The defendant argues the plaintiff’s son threw a soda bottle at him first. He says the plaintiff hit his car and the son punched him.

Then, the plaintiff bought a condo from the defendants, but she claims the defendants never told her their washing machine leaks. The defendant argue they sold the condo as is, so it’s not their fault the plaintiffs never got the unit inspected. They’re countersuing for attorney’s fees.

Plus, the plaintiff brings her landlord to court. She says the defendant insulted her in front of her friends and is withholding her security deposit, so she’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff left the place a mess when she moved out. She doesn’t think she owes the plaintiff anything back.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices