Physics to God

Can science convincingly show that God exists? In this episode, we explore one of the most profound questions in human history through the lens of modern physics and philosophy. We lay out a clear case for an intelligent cause behind the universe based on three independent scientific discoveries:
The fine-tuning of nature's constants
The elegant structure of the physical laws
The low-entropy, highly ordered initial conditions of the universe
We explain why these scientific insights are not just compatible with belief in God, but that they actually point us directly to an intelligent cause of our universe.
We also respond to common objections, including the "God of the Gaps" critique and the question of "Who Fine Tuned God?"
Timestamps:
0:00 - Introduction
1:21 - The History of the Design Argument
3:54 - The Fine Tuning Argument from the Constants of Nature
5:25 - The Mystery of the Constants and the Problem it Poses for a Theory of Everything
8:08 - How the Discovery of Fine Tuning Impacted the Pursuit of a Theory of Everything
11:10 - Why Fine Tuning Demands a Paradigm Shift
13:13 - How Physics Points to Intelligent Design from the Fine Tuned Constants of Nature
14:25 - The Design Argument from the Laws of Physics
14:46 - Why These Laws of Nature?
15:16 - The Dream of a Unique Final Theory
16:34 - The Clue from Design
17:25 - The Solution of an Intelligent Designer
18:12 - The Argument from the Ordered Initial Conditions of the Universe
18:26 - Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics
19:17 - Our Low Entropy Universe
20:19 - Roger Penrose's Probability Calculation
21:40 - An Intelligent Cause for the Order of the Big Bang
22:36 - Common Objections
22:57 - Why These Arguments Aren't God of the Gaps
24:08 - Who Fine Tuned and Designed God?
25:17 - Multiverse: Scientists' Alternative to God
27:19 - Three Arguments. One Compelling Case.
 
Get essay versions of all episodes in Season 1: Intelligent Cause and Season 2: Analyzing & Rejecting Multiverse
Subscribe to Physics to God on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
Follow us at:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100089972838595
X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/PhysicsToGod
Instagram: https://instagram.com/physics_to_god

This episode can be seen as a stand-alone summary of our analysis and rejection of
the multiverse, or as a review of the main points of this season. It's perfect for anyone
interested in understanding why the multiverse fails but doesn't have the stamina to
listen to the whole season. You can find a written version of the episode here. We also
just released the first episode of the complete Season 2 about Multiverse on our
@PhysicsToGod YouTube channel.
Some points we discuss in this episode include: The Fine Tuning Argument, Three
Premises of Multiverse, Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Eternal
Inflation, String Theory, Naive Multiverse, Is Our Grand Universe Typical?, Infinities
and Measures, The Boltzmann Brain Problem, The Three Layers of the Measure
Problem, Is the Multiverse Science?
Timestamps:
0:00 - Opening
0:13 - What is the Multiverse?
3:07 - Fine Tuning
6:42 - Three Premises of Multiverse
10:01 - Infinite Multiverse Premise
15:45 - Varied Multiverse Premise
21:41 - Naive Multiverse
28:50 - Typical Universe Premise
33:55 - Is Our Grand Universe Typical?
35:36 - Infinities and Measures
38:28 - Ad Hoc Measures
40:01 - Intuitive Measures Don't Work
45:46 - The Fine Tuned Measure Problem
48:00 - Three Layers of the Measure Problem
49:05 - Is the Multiverse Science?
53:55 - Conclusion
Get essay versions of all episodes in Season 1: Intelligent Cause and Season 2: Analyzing & Rejecting Multiverse
Subscribe to Physics to God on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
Follow us at:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100089972838595
X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/PhysicsToGod
Instagram: https://instagram.com/physics_to_god

This episode examines physicist Roger Penrose's extremely wild and imaginative theory for
explaining the ridiculously improbable order of the Big Bang without invoking an intelligent
cause. Penrose describes the tremendous problem of explaining the unlikely Big Bang as
follows:
In order to produce a universe resembling the one in which we live, the Creator would
have to aim for an absurdly tiny volume of the phase space of possible universes –
about 1/10^10^123 of the entire volume...This is an extraordinary figure. One could not
possibly even write the number down in full...
When Penrose speaks about the Creator, he means it metaphorically, as he doesn't believe in
God. This episode shows how Penrose's theory - Conformal Cyclic Cosmology - attempts to
explain the improbable order of the Big Bang without an intelligent Creator, and ultimately
justifies why we think the argument for an intelligent cause still stands.
Timestamps:
0:00 - Opening
1:54 - Introduction
3:10 - Conformal Cyclic Cosmology
7:14 - The Universe Loses Track of Time….
12:09 - Disappearance of Mass
17:49 - Hawking Radiation and Entropy Transcendence
22:23 - Evaluating Conformal Cyclic Cosmology
Get essay versions of all episodes in Season 1: Intelligent Cause and Season 2: Analyzing & Rejecting Multiverse
Subscribe to Physics to God on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
Follow us at:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100089972838595
X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/PhysicsToGod
Instagram: https://instagram.com/physics_to_god

Our universe's initial state was incredibly unlikely, and if it were even slightly different, nothing
would exist except for black holes. This episode discusses physicist Paul Steinhardt's theory of
Bouncing Cosmology which attempts to explain this unlikely beginning without requiring either
an infinite varied multiverse or an intelligent cause. This theory is so wild and imaginative that
we really had to struggle to come up with analogies to make it understandable to everyone. But
we did. And these might just be our best analogies yet.
Timestamps:
0:00 - Opening
1:34 - Introduction
4:35 - Cyclic Cosmology
7:40 - Entropy Density
12:44- Bouncing Cosmology
18:21 - Changing Dark Energy
21:40 - Evaluating Bouncing Cosmology
Get essay versions of all episodes in Season 1: Intelligent Cause and Season 2: Analyzing & Rejecting Multiverse
Subscribe to Physics to God on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
Follow us at:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100089972838595
X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/PhysicsToGod
Instagram: https://instagram.com/physics_to_god

Biologist Richard Dawkins, in his book, The Blind Watchmaker, wrote the following:
The theory of evolution by cumulative natural selection is the only theory we know of that is, in
principle, capable of explaining the existence of organized complexity. Even if the evidence did
not favour it, it would still be the best theory available.
In this episode, we discuss physicist Lee Smolin's attempt to extend natural selection from
biology and apply it to the cosmos as a whole in order to explain fine tuning in physics. We start
by discussing black holes and baby universes and end with what Smolin calls the meta-laws
dilemma.
Timestamps:
0:00 - Opening
1:35 - Alternative Theories
4:00 - Biological and Cosmological Natural Selection
7:51 - The Three Premises of Cosmological Natural Selection
16:05 - Not a Genuine Multiverse
18:34 - Problems With All Three Premises
24:12 - Smolin's False Prediction
25:53 - The Fine Tuned Meta-Law
28:54 - Summary of Problems with Cosmological Natural Selection
30:39 - The Meta-law Dilemma
Get essay versions of all episodes in Season 1: Intelligent Cause and Season 2: Analyzing & Rejecting Multiverse
Subscribe to Physics to God on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
Follow us at:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100089972838595
X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/PhysicsToGod
Instagram: https://instagram.com/physics_to_god