Skip to content
Radio Logo
PodcastsCoursesLaw School

Law School

The Law School of America
Law School
Latest episode

1997 episodes

  • Law School

    Criminal Law Deep Dive: Property Crimes and Crimes Against the Habitation — Larceny, Embezzlement, False Pretenses, Robbery, Burglary, and Arson

    28/10/2026 | 1h 21 mins.
    ⚖️Make Criminal Law a Game [ ✨ START PLAYING ✨ ]⚖️
    Go deeper with an interactive companion guide from The Law School of America. 👉 🚀 Open the Interactive📖 Book Guide📖 and sharpen your understanding! 👈
    🎧 EPISODE SUMMARY 🎧
    Property and habitation crimes turn on precise boundaries and statutory elements.
    Theft offenses distinguish between custody (limited control), possession (rightful control), and title (ownership).
    Larceny requires: (1) trespassory (2) taking and (3) carrying away of (4) tangible personal property (5) of another with (6) intent to permanently deprive.
    Intent is defeated by borrowing or a claim of right. Under the continuing trespass doctrine, forming intent after a wrongful taking completes larceny.
    Embezzlement is the fraudulent conversion of property by one in lawful possession, with intent to defraud.
    Fraud-based crimes depend on what interest passes:
    Larceny by Trick: Obtaining possession only by fraud with intent to steal.
    False Pretenses: Obtaining title via intentional false misrepresentation with intent to defraud.
    Receiving Stolen Property requires taking control of stolen property, knowing its status, to permanently deprive.
    Forgery is making or altering a false writing with intent to defraud. Uttering is offering it as genuine.
    Robbery is larceny from a person or presence by force or threat of immediate harm. Extortion involves threats of future harm.
    Common Law Burglary is breaking and entering a dwelling at night with intent to commit a felony. Modern burglary requires only unlawful entry into any structure with felony or theft intent.
    Common Law Arson is the malicious burning (charring) of another's dwelling. Modern arson extends to any structure or vehicle.
    Key exam diagnostic steps:
    Determine if custody, possession, or title passed.
    ℹ️ INFORMATION, PRIVACY POLICY & TERMS OF USE ℹ️
    The Podcast and Website Purpose
    The Law School Podcast and 1L Study Aide webpage supplements law-school and Bar Exam study with strategies, condensed rules, quizzes, and flashcards.
    Educational Disclaimer
    Content is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice, creates no attorney-client relationship, and does not guarantee law-school or Bar Exam success.
    Privacy Policy
    No account or login is required.
    This webpage uses no forms or analytics to collect personal information.
    Quiz and flashcard activity stays in your browser and may clear when local site data is removed.
    Terms of Use
    By using this webpage, you agree to use its content only for lawful, personal, noncommercial educational purposes. It supplements—not replaces—courses, textbooks, official materials, or qualified instruction.
  • Law School

    Criminal Law Deep Dive: Homicide and Crimes Against the Person — Murder, Felony Murder, Manslaughter, Assault, Battery, Kidnapping, and Sexual Assault

    27/10/2026 | 1h 16 mins.
    ⚖️Make Criminal Law a Game [ ✨ START PLAYING ✨ ]⚖️
    Go deeper with an interactive companion guide from The Law School of America. 👉 🚀 Open the Interactive📖 Book Guide📖 and sharpen your understanding! 👈
    🎧 EPISODE SUMMARY 🎧
    Crimes against the person are categorized by the severity of harm and the defendant's mental state.
    Homicide requires the unlawful killing of a human being resulting in brain death or respiratory/circulatory failure.
    Common law murder is an unlawful killing with malice aforethought, satisfied by four mental states:
    1. Intent to kill.
    2. Intent to inflict great bodily harm.
    3. Depraved-heart murder (reckless indifference to human life).
    4. Felony murder (unintended killing during an inherently dangerous felony like BARRK: Burglary, Arson, Rape, Robbery, Kidnapping).
    Murder defaults to second-degree unless elevated to first-degree by premeditation/deliberation, enumerated felonies, or heinous means.
    Voluntary manslaughter is intentional killing mitigated by heat of passion from adequate provocation or imperfect self-defense.
    Involuntary manslaughter is unintentional killing caused by criminal negligence or during a misdemeanor.
    The Model Penal Code categorizes homicide into Murder (extreme indifference), Manslaughter (recklessness or EMED), and Negligent Homicide.
    Non-fatal offenses include Battery (unlawful application of force), Mayhem (permanent disfigurement), and Assault (attempted battery or creating apprehension of harm).
    False imprisonment is unlawful confinement, while Kidnapping adds movement or concealment. Rape is non-consensual sexual penetration, and Statutory Rape is strict liability based on age.
    Key grading steps for homicide analysis:
    1. Test common law murder malice states.
    2. Check statutory first-degree murder elevation.
    3. Evaluate mitigation to voluntary manslaughter.
    4. Consider involuntary manslaughter or negligent homicide if malice is absent.
    Following this hierarchy captures all theories of liability and mitigation.
    ℹ️ INFORMATION, PRIVACY POLICY & TERMS OF USE ℹ️
    The Podcast and Website Purpose
    The Law School Podcast and 1L Study Aide webpage supplements law-school and Bar Exam study with strategies, condensed rules, quizzes, and flashcards.
    Educational Disclaimer
    Content is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice, creates no attorney-client relationship, and does not guarantee law-school or Bar Exam success.
    Privacy Policy
    No account or login is required.
    This webpage uses no forms or analytics to collect personal information.
    Quiz and flashcard activity stays in your browser and may clear when local site data is removed.
    Terms of Use
    By using this webpage, you agree to use its content only for lawful, personal, noncommercial educational purposes. It supplements—not replaces—courses, textbooks, official materials, or qualified instruction.
  • Law School

    Criminal Law Deep Dive: Justifications for Punishment, the Principle of Legality, Actus Reus, Mens Rea, Concurrence, and Causation

    26/10/2026 | 1h 5 mins.
    ⚖️Make Criminal Law a Game [ ✨ START PLAYING ✨ ]⚖️
    Go deeper with an interactive companion guide from The Law School of America. 👉 🚀 Open the Interactive📖 Book Guide📖 and sharpen your understanding! 👈
    🎧 EPISODE SUMMARY 🎧
    Criminal law analysis begins by breaking an offense into its foundational elements and testing each requirement in sequence.
    Punishment rests on four philosophical pillars: retribution (backward-looking moral desert) and the three utilitarian goals of deterrence (specific and general), incapacitation, and rehabilitation.
    The principle of legality forbids retroactive criminalization (ex post facto laws) and invalidates statutes that fail to give ordinary citizens fair notice or that invite arbitrary police enforcement (void-for-vagueness). Under the rule of lenity, intractable statutory ambiguity is resolved in the defendant’s favor.
    Every crime requires an actus reus—either a voluntary physical act (a willed bodily movement, excluding reflexes, convulsions, sleepwalking, or unconsciousness) or an omission accompanied by a specific legal duty to act (arising from statute, status relationship, contract, voluntary assumption of care, or creation of the peril), plus knowledge of the facts and the ability to perform. Mere status (such as addiction) cannot be criminalized, though possession (actual or constructive) satisfies actus reus.
    At common law, mens rea falls into four categories:
    Specific intent (inchoate crimes, premeditated murder, theft offenses, burglary, assault), which uniquely allows defenses of voluntary intoxication and unreasonable mistake of fact.
    The Model Penal Code replaces common law mental states with four hierarchical levels applied to each conduct, circumstance, or result element: purposely (conscious object), knowingly (awareness or practical certainty, including willful blindness), recklessly (conscious disregard of a substantial and unjustifiable risk), and negligently (objective failure to perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk). When an MPC statute is silent on mens rea, recklessly is the default minimum, and any stated mens rea travels to all material elements unless a contrary purpose plainly appears.
    Under concurrence, the mens rea must exist at the moment of the actus reus and must motivate the act. Under transferred intent, an intent to harm one victim transfers to an unintended victim who suffers the same type of harm, supporting convictions for both attempt against the target and the completed crime against the actual victim.
    Result crimes require both actual causation ("but-for" cause or substantial factor in accelerating the harm) and proximate causation (foreseeability). Pre-existing victim vulnerabilities (eggshell skull) never break the chain of causation. Dependent (responsive) intervening causes break the chain only if abnormal or bizarre (such as gross medical malpractice, not ordinary negligence), whereas independent (coincidental) intervening causes break the chain unless they were foreseeable.

    ℹ️ INFORMATION, PRIVACY POLICY & TERMS OF USE ℹ️
    The Podcast and Website Purpose
    The Law School Podcast and 1L Study Aide webpage supplements law-school and Bar Exam study with strategies, condensed rules, quizzes, and flashcards.
    Educational Disclaimer
    Content is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice, creates no attorney-client relationship, and does not guarantee law-school or Bar Exam success.
    Privacy Policy
    No account or login is required.
    This webpage uses no forms or analytics to collect personal information.
    Quiz and flashcard activity stays in your browser and may clear when local site data is removed.
    Terms of Use
    By using this webpage, you agree to use its content only for lawful, personal, noncommercial educational purposes. It supplements—not replaces—courses, textbooks, official materials, or qualified instruction.
  • Law School

    Civil Procedure Part Seven: Preclusion and the Complete Civil Procedure Examination System

    25/10/2026 | 1h 5 mins.
    🏛️ Comprehensive Civil Procedure Assessment Framework & Preclusion
    🏛️⚖️ Make Comprehensive Civil Procedure Assessment Framework & Preclusion Click: [ ✨ CLICK HERE ✨ ]⚖️📖 Go deeper with an interactive companion guide from The Law School of America.
    👉 🚀 Open the Interactive Study Guide — and sharpen your understanding! 👈

    🎧 EPISODE SUMMARY 🎧
    Claim preclusion ordinarily prevents renewed litigation of the same claim after a qualifying final judgment, including available grounds omitted from the first action. Issue preclusion prevents relitigation of an identical issue actually litigated, determined, and essential to a qualifying judgment, subject to opportunity and fairness requirements. Nonparty binding requires a recognized justification; nonmutual use requires separate analysis. An integrated examination answer follows the case's procedural stage, checks each doctrine's prerequisites, and states precisely what the court should do next.
    ℹ️ INFORMATION, PRIVACY POLICY & TERMS OF USE ℹ️
    The Podcast and Website Purpose
    The Law School Podcast and 1L Study Aide webpage supplements law-school and Bar Exam study with strategies, condensed rules, quizzes, and flashcards.
    Educational Disclaimer
    Content is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice, creates no attorney-client relationship, and does not guarantee law-school or Bar Exam success.
    Privacy Policy
    No account or login is required.
    This webpage uses no forms or analytics to collect personal information.
    Quiz and flashcard activity stays in your browser and may clear when local site data is removed.
    Terms of Use
    By using this webpage, you agree to use its content only for lawful, personal, noncommercial educational purposes. It supplements—not replaces—courses, textbooks, official materials, or qualified instruction.
  • Law School

    Civil Procedure Part Six: Jury Trial, JMOL, New Trial, Relief from Judgment, and Appeals

    24/10/2026 | 1h 15 mins.
    🏛️ Trial and Post-Trial Procedure 🏛️⚖️ Make Trial and Post-Trial Procedure Click: [ ✨ CLICK HERE ✨ ]⚖️📖 Go deeper with an interactive companion guide from The Law School of America.
    👉 🚀 Open the Interactive Study Guide — and sharpen your understanding! 👈

    🎧 EPISODE SUMMARY 🎧
    Preserve jury rights issue by issue, distinguish sufficiency from trial fairness, and match each motion to its timing and remedy. Rule 60 supplies limited judgment relief; appellate review requires jurisdiction, timeliness, and preservation. Legal, factual, and discretionary questions then receive their respective review standards.
    ℹ️ INFORMATION, PRIVACY POLICY & TERMS OF USE ℹ️
    The Podcast and Website Purpose
    The Law School Podcast and 1L Study Aide webpage supplements law-school and Bar Exam study with strategies, condensed rules, quizzes, and flashcards.
    Educational Disclaimer
    Content is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice, creates no attorney-client relationship, and does not guarantee law-school or Bar Exam success.
    Privacy Policy
    No account or login is required.
    This webpage uses no forms or analytics to collect personal information.
    Quiz and flashcard activity stays in your browser and may clear when local site data is removed.
    Terms of Use
    By using this webpage, you agree to use its content only for lawful, personal, noncommercial educational purposes. It supplements—not replaces—courses, textbooks, official materials, or qualified instruction.
More Courses podcasts
About Law School
The Law School of America podcast is designed for listeners who what to expand and enhance their understanding of the American legal system. It provides you with legal principles in small digestible bites to make learning easy. If you're willing to put in the time, The Law School of America podcasts can take you from novice to knowledgeable in a reasonable amount of time.
Podcast website

Listen to Law School, Platypus Economics with Justin Wolfers and many other podcasts from around the world with the radio.net app

Get the free radio.net app

  • Stations and podcasts to bookmark
  • Stream via Wi-Fi or Bluetooth
  • Supports Carplay & Android Auto
  • Many other app features