MinterEllisonRuddWatts

Send us your feedback In this follow up episode, Partners Gillian Service and Megan Evans, discuss the Holidays Act reform. They explore why the reform is significant, what operational changes employers should prepare for, and how these changes aim to simplify compliance and reduce litigation. From hours-based leave accrual to mandatory pay statements and the introduction of leave compensation payments, Gillian and Megan provide practical insights and highlight key challenges businesses may face during the transition period.[01:06] Gillian explains that unclear laws lead to non-compliance and litigation. Megan adds that previous governments have tried and failed to fix the Act, making this overhaul a significant milestone. They stress that operational details will matter greatly.[03:05] They discuss, when do extra shifts become “contracted”? And they explain that regular overtime may need to be reflected in employment agreements to avoid misclassification and miscalculation of entitlements.[06:05] Gillian highlights that under the new system, employees may experience a drop in pay during leave compared to the current system. Megan stresses the importance of educating employees about this change.[07:35] Gillian and Megan discuss the ability to take leave in hours rather than full or half days, which benefits employees but adds complexity for employers, especially those with variable schedules. They introduce the concept of a “notional roster.”[09:04] Megan clarifies how allowances will be treated under the new system. Fixed allowances must be included in leave calculations, while variable components like bonuses and commissions will not. Employers may need to renegotiate contracts.[10:34] They discuss that public holidays will use a clearer “seven out of 13 weeks” test, replacing the current multi-factor approach. This should reduce litigation but requires employers to track work patterns.[11:34] Gillian and Megan discuss the two-year transition period. While generous on paper, it may be tight for large employers with complex systems. They note that early implementation is not allowed.[13:02] They explore the new system, employees can cash up 25% of their hourly leave balance annually. This could help employers manage large leave liabilities but requires employee initiation.[15:32] Gillian summaries that employers must still remediate historic liabilities, but once an agreed amount is paid, no further claims can be made. This approach aims to reduce compliance costs.[17:37] Gillian and Megan discuss the bill that is expected in early 2026, followed by the select committee process. They cover how the Government aims to pass legislation before the next election and is actively seeking feedback from businesses and employers are encourage to make submissions and share practial insights to ensure the reforms are workable, enduring and straight forward.  Information in this episode is accurate as at the date of recording, 20 November 2025. Please contact Gillian Service, Megan Evans or our Employment team if you need legal advice or guidance on any of the topics discussed in the episode. Don’t forget to rate, review or follow MinterEllisonRuddWatts wherever you get your podcasts. You can sign up to receive upFor show notes and additional resources visit minterellison.co.nz/podcasts

Send us your feedback In our final episode for 2025, Technology Partner Tom Maasland reconnects with ChatGPT, now powered by GPT-5.2, to explore the rapid evolution of conversational AI and its potential impact on the legal landscape. Join us for a festive and engaging discussion on what the future holds for law and technology with one of our most thought-provoking guests.[01:31] Tom dives into this interview explaining the premise of the episode to ChatGPT-5.2 and the audience. ChatGPT-5.2 introduces itself and Tom recalls the 2024 interview with GPT 4.0.[03:02] ChatGPT-5.2 shares major upgrades since GPT 4.0: Smoother conversational flow, better context retention, and improved reasoning. It now connects ideas more like a human and provides richer, more trustworthy answers. Accuracy and access to current information have also improved, though users should still verify critical details.[06:12] Tom explains how he uses ChatGPT for meeting prep and ChatGPT-5.2 adds examples like brainstorming, creative writing, and casual conversation. It also introduces proactive suggestions, making interactions more dynamic and helpful.[08:18] ChatGPT-5.2 Pulse keeps the model aware of trends and fresh info, now available in New Zealand. ChatGPT-5.2 also explains its adaptive response system, which automatically switches between quick answers and deep reasoning depending on the question.[10:56] Tom asks ChatGPT-5.2 about image generation, video creation, and music generation features that are emerging. GPT confirms a new partnership with Disney for AI-generated videos featuring iconic characters starting in early 2026.[11:59} Tom queries ChatGPT-5.2 over its parent company OpenAI's recent deal with Disney and asks ChatGPT-5.2 to expand on the details of the deal. [13:07] GPT breaks down the differences between Free, Paid, and Pro tiers. Tom then asks fun holiday questions: favourite Christmas film, tech buzzwords, and AI predictions for the next five years.[14:07] Tom asks ChatGPT-5.2 to answer a quick fire round of festive related questions. And Tom asks his final question, which is the same question he asked in 2024. How does ChatGPT-5.2 see the world having been changed by AI in the next five years? [15:44] Tom's shares his overall reflections on having a conversation with ChatGPT-5.2, what he found has improved compared to 2024, what was noteworthy from the discussion, and that a reminder that AI can make mistakes even the most advanced models. Information in this episode is accurate as at the date of recording, 15 December 2025.Please contact Tom Maasland or our Technology team if you need legal advice and guidance on any of the topics discussed in the episode. And don’t forget to rate, review or follow MinterEllisonRuddWatts wherever you get your podcasts. You can also email us directly at [email protected] and sign up to receive technology updates via your inbox here.We’d also like to thank you for your continued support of Tech Suite and invite you to complete our brief end-of-year survey to help shape future episodes. The survey takes approximately three minutes to complete and is completely anonymous. Your feedback is invaluable in helping us deliver content that remains relevant, engaFor show notes and additional resources visit minterellison.co.nz/podcasts

Send us your feedback In this episode, Sustainability Leader and Partner Holly Hill sits down with Matt Connolly, Air New Zealand's Sustainability Lead for Energy Transition, to explore the airline's leading initiatives including its Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) trial, climate-related transition plan, next generation aircrafts, and fuel optimisation.[01:14] Holly and Matt discuss that aviation is inherently unsustainable because it relies on burning fossil fuels, making it a major source of greenhouse gas emissions.[02:19] Holly and Matt explore Air New Zealand’s current use of SAF, noting its scarcity and high cost. He explains that collaboration with corporates is critical to scaling SAF globally and that the pilot program in New Zealand is designed to foster these partnerships.[02:49] Matt describes how SAF is chemically similar to jet fuel and can be used in existing aircraft without modification. He explains that emissions reductions come from SAF’s lifecycle, as it is produced from biogenic and waste sources rather than fossil fuels. He also outlines how emissions benefits are shared between airlines and corporate partners through scope 1 and scope 3 reductions.[04:48] Matt shares that corporate partners purchase emissions reductions to match portions of their travel. He notes that Air New Zealand used 1.7% SAF in its fuel mix last financial year, which equates to approximately 50,000 tonnes of avoided emissions compared to fossil jet fuel.[06:18] They explore Air New Zealand’s short-term target of 10% SAF in its fuel mix by 2030 and a long-term goal of achieving net zero by 2050. Matt explains that global aviation bodies expect SAF to make up two-thirds to 100% of jet fuel by mid-century.[06:48] Matt says the SAF pilot has generated interest among corporates, but emphasises that scaling SAF requires broad collaboration. Air New Zealand is working with sustainability groups and auditors to build trust and create a robust system for corporate participation.[07:48] Holly and Matt outline the economic challenges of scaling SAF, including its current cost premium and the need for large-scale, capital-intensive projects. He explains that moving SAF down the technology cost curve is essential for affordability.[08:48] They discuss Air New Zealand’s ongoing conversations with the New Zealand government about SAF and notes that governments worldwide are approaching the challenge in different ways. He emphasises the importance of finding a solution that works for New Zealand.[09:18] Matt explains that partnerships are key to SAF success globally. He notes that airlines making progress on SAF are those working closely with corporate partners to build commercially sustainable approaches.[10:18] Matt summarises that aviation is difficult to decarbonise, but SAF is a viable solution today. He stresses that partnerships are essential for scaling SAF and reiterates Air New Zealand’s commitment to net zero by 2050[11:47] They round out the episode by sharing Air New Zealand’s research into electric and hydrogen-powered aircraft, including a technical demonstrator project with Beta Technologies. He explains that while these technologies may not play a major role before 2050, they represent a long-term opportunity to move away from fossil fuels entirely.Information in this episode is accurate as at the date of recording, 24 November 2025.Please contact Holly HillFor show notes and additional resources visit minterellison.co.nz/podcasts

Send us your feedback In this episode, Technology Partner Kate Cruickshank sits down with Buddhika Rajapakse, Associate Director at Concept Consulting, to explore the untapped potential of Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) technology in New Zealand and discuss the key findings from the recently released multi-client report Powerful Potential: New Zealand’s Vehicle-to-Grid Opportunity.[01:14] Kate and Buddhika consider the fundamentals of bi-directional electric vehicle (EV) charging and why EV batteries represent a unique and flexible energy storage opportunity. They explain that, beyond powering a car, an EV battery can also be used in certain circumstances to supply electricity to appliances, homes, businesses, and even feed energy back into the grid. The conversation breaks down the different bidirectional applications (vehicle-to-load (V2L), vehicle-to-home/premises (V2H/V2P), and vehicle-to-grid (V2G)) and how each works in practice.[06:45] Buddhika discusses the critical technology stack required for V2G to succeed, including V2G-capable EVs, chargers, smart retail offerings, and interoperable software, emphasising the importance of each layer working in synchronicity.[10:02] They then turn to the report itself, outlining the drivers behind its development, the sector-wide collaboration that shaped it, and the modelling used to quantify the value V2G could unlock across the transmission and distribution electricity value chain, the wholesale market and generation and also for individual consumers.[13:11] Kate and Buddhika consider the consumer experience as a critical factor for the success of V2G uptake, highlighting the need for simple, compelling consumer information and offerings. Buddhika points out the UK’s EV-as-a-service type model from Octopus Energy and BYD as a leading example that make V2G effortless and attractive for consumers.[17:04] Finally, they consider what industry participants should be focusing on next, including the importance of national and Trans-Tasman alignment on standards, and the long-term outlook where the use of V2G technologies could significantly enhance grid resilience and flexibility.Information in this episode is accurate as at the date of recording, 6 November 2025.Please contact Kate Cruickshank or our Technology team if you need legal advice and guidance on any of the topics discussed in the episode. And don’t forget to rate, review or follow MinterEllisonRuddWatts wherever you get your podcasts. You can also email us directly at [email protected] and sign up to receive technology updates via your inbox here.  Additional resources Powerful Potential: New Zealand’s Vehicle-to-Grid Opportunity – 25 September 2025For show notes and additional resources visit minterellison.co.nz/podcasts

Send us your feedback In this episode, Partner Tom Maasland and Senior Solicitor Abbey James from our Technology team unpack Transitional Services Agreements (TSAs), a critical yet often overlooked component of business transitions, offering both legal and practical insights to help navigate them with confidence.[00:50] Tom and Abbey discuss the fundamentals of TSAs, explaining what they are, the services they typically cover, and how they help buyers “keep the lights on” and maintain business continuity during the transition to full operational independence after a purchase.[02:08] Abbey and Tom explore what should be included (and excluded) in a TSA, noting that these decisions largely depend on the complexity of the business being sold and the extent to which its IT systems are intertwined[04:14] They canvas the key features of TSAs and highlight some common legal pitfalls. Tom emphasises that TSAs are not profit-making arrangements, so fees are typically structured as fixed or cost-plus. Abbey adds that buyers should also manage expectations around service delivery, noting that TSAs are designed to ensure continuity, rather than service excellence.[07:12] They discuss termination, liability, and governance emphasising the need for clear exit plans, fair liability caps, and thought-out governance structures. Tom notes that defining IP ownership and licensing during the TSA is critical to avoid disputes, especially when shared technology is involved.[09:08] Tom considers the tech entanglement risks, explaining how today’s cloud based, and subscription-based software models impose significant licensing restrictions that can delay transitions and inflate costs. He notes that reviewing licence terms and divestment rights early is essential to avoid costly surprises.[10:26] They round out the episode sharing their top tips for building a successful TSA, starting with engaging early, well before the sale and purchase agreement is signed. They highlight the importance of clearly defining the scope, identifying third-party and staffing risks, managing data safely through technical (not just contractual) measures, and planning ahead for stranded assets. Information in this episode is accurate as at the date of recording, 24 October 2025. Please contact Tom Maasland or our Technology team if you need legal advice and guidance on any of the topics discussed in the episode.Don’t forget to rate, review or follow MinterEllisonRuddWatts wherever you get your podcasts. You can also email us directly at [email protected] and sign up to receive technology updates via your inbox here. For show notes and additional resources visit minterellison.co.nz/podcasts