The Epstein Chronicles

• Murder In Moscow: A Recap Of The Bryan Kohberger Dateline Special (5/12/25)

  On May 9, 2025, NBC's Dateline aired a two-hour special titled "The Terrible Night on King Road," delving into the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students and the case against Bryan Kohberger. The episode presented previously unreleased evidence, including surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra—matching Kohberger's vehicle—circling the victims' residence multiple times on the night of the murders. Additionally, cell phone data indicated that Kohberger's device connected to a tower near the crime scene 23 times in the months leading up to the incident. Investigators also uncovered disturbing online activity on Kohberger's devices, such as searches related to serial killer Ted Bundy and nonconsensual pornography, as well as images of female students in swimsuits linked to the victims or their acquaintances.The special featured interviews with individuals who had interacted with Kohberger prior to the crimes. One former graduate student recounted a peculiar text message from Kohberger following a brief meeting at a pool party, describing the message as overly formal and unsettling. The program also included conversations with friends of the victims and experts in criminology and genetics, providing context and analysis of the case. As Kohberger awaits his trial, scheduled to begin in August 2025, the episode offered viewers a comprehensive overview of the investigation and the evidence amassed against him.to contact me:[email protected]:Searches and selfies: Idaho college murder suspect Bryan Kohberger's online habits emerge in new detailsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

  --------  

  19:13
• The Diddy Trial: What To Expect During Opening Statements (5/12/25)

  Opening statements in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial are set to commence today in Manhattan. Prosecutors allege that over two decades, Combs operated a criminal enterprise through his music and business ventures, coercing women into drug-fueled sexual encounters, some of which were filmed without consent. Key evidence includes a 2016 hotel surveillance video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his former partner, Cassie Ventura, who is expected to testify. The prosecution aims to establish a pattern of abuse and manipulation, highlighting events referred to as "Freak Offs," where victims were allegedly exploited and subjected to violence and intimidation.The defense, led by attorney Marc Agnifilo, is anticipated to argue that Combs' relationships and lifestyle choices were consensual, portraying him as a participant in mutual activities rather than a perpetrator of coercion. They may also contend that any violence in his relationships was reciprocal, framing it as domestic disputes rather than criminal acts. The trial, expected to last approximately eight weeks, will feature testimony from multiple witnesses, some under pseudonyms, and could involve the mention of various celebrities during proceedings. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges and faces a potential life sentence if convicted..to  contact me:[email protected]:Attorneys in Sean Combs' case set to present dueling narratives in trial openingsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

  --------  

  16:08
• Judge Subramanian Denies Diddy's Last Ditch Effort To Get Evidence Tossed (Part 3) (5/12/25)

  In the federal case 24-CR-542 (AS), Sean Combs filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained from four separate warrants issued in 2024. These included a January warrant targeting Combs’s iCloud accounts and three March warrants that authorized searches of his Los Angeles and Miami residences, as well as his person and two cell phones. Combs argued that the government’s warrant applications were intentionally misleading and requested a Franks hearing—a legal proceeding used to challenge the truthfulness of statements made in an affidavit supporting a search warrant. He also contended that the warrants constituted unconstitutional “general warrants,” lacking the specificity required under the Fourth Amendment.Judge Arun Subramanian denied the motion, concluding that the warrant applications did not meet the legal standard required for a Franks hearing and that they were not impermissibly broad. The court found no evidence of deliberate falsehood or reckless disregard for the truth in the government’s affidavits, nor did it determine the warrants lacked sufficient particularity in describing the items to be seized. As a result, the evidence collected through these searches will be admissible at trial, marking a key procedural victory for the prosecution as it prepares to present a wide-ranging case against Combs involving allegations of racketeering and sex trafficking.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.326.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

  --------  

  11:33
• Judge Subramanian Denies Diddy's Last Ditch Effort To Get Evidence Tossed (Part 2) (5/12/25)

  In the federal case 24-CR-542 (AS), Sean Combs filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained from four separate warrants issued in 2024. These included a January warrant targeting Combs’s iCloud accounts and three March warrants that authorized searches of his Los Angeles and Miami residences, as well as his person and two cell phones. Combs argued that the government’s warrant applications were intentionally misleading and requested a Franks hearing—a legal proceeding used to challenge the truthfulness of statements made in an affidavit supporting a search warrant. He also contended that the warrants constituted unconstitutional “general warrants,” lacking the specificity required under the Fourth Amendment.Judge Arun Subramanian denied the motion, concluding that the warrant applications did not meet the legal standard required for a Franks hearing and that they were not impermissibly broad. The court found no evidence of deliberate falsehood or reckless disregard for the truth in the government’s affidavits, nor did it determine the warrants lacked sufficient particularity in describing the items to be seized. As a result, the evidence collected through these searches will be admissible at trial, marking a key procedural victory for the prosecution as it prepares to present a wide-ranging case against Combs involving allegations of racketeering and sex trafficking.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.326.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

  --------  

  12:24
• Judge Subramanian Denies Diddy's Last Ditch Effort To Get Evidence Tossed (Part 1) (5/12/25)

  In the federal case 24-CR-542 (AS), Sean Combs filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained from four separate warrants issued in 2024. These included a January warrant targeting Combs’s iCloud accounts and three March warrants that authorized searches of his Los Angeles and Miami residences, as well as his person and two cell phones. Combs argued that the government’s warrant applications were intentionally misleading and requested a Franks hearing—a legal proceeding used to challenge the truthfulness of statements made in an affidavit supporting a search warrant. He also contended that the warrants constituted unconstitutional “general warrants,” lacking the specificity required under the Fourth Amendment.Judge Arun Subramanian denied the motion, concluding that the warrant applications did not meet the legal standard required for a Franks hearing and that they were not impermissibly broad. The court found no evidence of deliberate falsehood or reckless disregard for the truth in the government’s affidavits, nor did it determine the warrants lacked sufficient particularity in describing the items to be seized. As a result, the evidence collected through these searches will be admissible at trial, marking a key procedural victory for the prosecution as it prepares to present a wide-ranging case against Combs involving allegations of racketeering and sex trafficking.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.326.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

  --------  

  11:45

More News podcasts

Trending News podcasts

About The Epstein Chronicles

The Epstein Chronicles: Podcasts in Family