Powered by RND
PodcastsBusinessThinking On Paper

Thinking On Paper

The Human Story of Technology, Mark Fielding and Jeremy Gilbertson
Thinking On Paper
Latest episode

Available Episodes

5 of 181
  • The Car That Stops You From Making a Fatal Overtake: The Sensor That Sees the Crash You Can’t
    Everyone thinks they are a great driver. Most drivers think they can judge a safe overtake. They can’t. In this Thinking On Paper shot, Barry Lunn breaks down the sensor technology that sees eight cars ahead, detects velocity before brake lights appear, and intervenes when the driver is about to make a mistake.Radar, not cameras, not lidar, could be the backbone of next-generation driver assistance. We get into how millimetre-wave signals bounce around traffic, how machines detect danger long before humans register it, and why more than half of global crashes are rear-end collisions that could be prevented with earlier insight.We also examine what this means for trust: why people resist hands-off driving yet quickly rely on a system that prevents the accidents they didn’t even know they were about to cause.Please enjoy. And check out our full length technology interviews if you like what you hear.-- Other ways to connect with us:⁠Listen to every podcast⁠Follow us on ⁠Instagram⁠Follow us on ⁠X⁠Follow Mark on ⁠LinkedIn⁠Follow Jeremy on ⁠LinkedIn⁠Read our ⁠Substack⁠Email: [email protected]
    --------  
    3:36
  • The Five Rules Every Quantum Computer Must Follow (DeVincenzo’s Criteria Explained)
    What if someone handed you the recipe for a quantum computer? In this episode, that’s exactly what happens.Coleman Collins of IonQ breaks down DiVincenzo’s criteria, (a checklist proposed by physicist David DiVincenzo) the five capabilities any physical system needs before it can call itself a quantum computer. There are five criteria.A well-defined qubitAbility to initialize qubits. You must be able to reliably set every qubit to a known starting state.Long coherence times. The qubits must remain stable long enough to run operations without losing their quantum state.Ability to measure qubits. You need to read the state of each qubit at the end of the computation (ideally individually).A universal gate set built from entanglement and single-qubit control.Mix them all together in a serving bowl and these let you perform any quantum computation you wish.You now know the foundation behind every major quantum architecture, from superconducting circuits to trapped ions.Cheers, Mark and Jeremy.Keep Thinking On Paper. Other ways to connect with us:⁠Listen to every podcast⁠Follow us on ⁠Instagram⁠Follow us on ⁠X⁠Follow Mark on ⁠LinkedIn⁠Follow Jeremy on ⁠LinkedIn⁠Read our ⁠Substack⁠Email: [email protected]
    --------  
    5:20
  • The Electronics That Survive Space: Inside Radiation-Hardened Power Systems | Danny Andreev, CEO Sunburn Schematics
    Radiation-hardened space electronics don’t get splashy headlines, but nothing in orbit works without them. Starship, the ISS, Amazon’s Project Kuiper, Starlink... the whole caboodle depends on hardware that keeps running when the vacuum, extreme temperatures, and radiation of space would annihilate your laptop plug on Earth.The extreme environments of space are no place for trial and error with the small things.  Danny Andreev, CEO of Sunburn Schematics, designs those systems for real missions. In this episode of Thinking on Paper, he walks you through what actually keeps spacecraft alive: particle-induced faults, gate-driver failures, thermal shock, and the methods space companies use to mitigate the risks.We go from chip-level physics to the industrial picture: why the next phase of space isn’t glossy renders but an off-world supply chain built from proven terrestrial machinery, cheaper short-lived satellites, and megawatt-class power standards that mirror EV infrastructure.It’s an unromantic, inside-the-factory look at how space becomes an industry rather than a spectacle.What we cover:- Radiation effects and how engineers harden real hardware- Why thermal cycling destroys more missions than radiation- How chips are stress-tested for orbit- The economics of moving from billion-dollar craft to replaceable fleets- Why the first lunar machines will look like modified construction gear- The engineering mindset needed for a multi-planet infrastructureThis is a technical, grounded conversation for people who build things and curious minds who want to learn why and how.Please enjoy the show. And subscribe. That's the best way to help other people find the channel.Cheers,Mark & Jeremy.--TIMESTAMPS(00:00) Thinking On Paper Trailer(02:59) The Role of DC to DC Converters in Space(03:46) Challenges of Power Systems in Space(05:30) Designing for Reliability in Space(07:13) The Impact of Radiation on Electronics(08:52) Testing and Validation of Space Electronics(11:03) Environmental Challenges for Space Electronics(12:28) Success Rates and Lessons Learned(15:22) The Importance of Music in Space Missions(22:30) The Future of Space Exploration(25:23) Building a Lunar Economy(27:51) Power Conversion in Space(31:57) Exciting Developments in Space Technology(35:13) Philosophical Insights on Space and Life--Say hello! Connect more technology dots with us elsewhere: ⁠Listen to every podcast⁠Follow us on ⁠Instagram⁠Follow us on ⁠X⁠Follow Mark on ⁠LinkedIn⁠Follow Jeremy on ⁠LinkedIn⁠Read our ⁠Substack⁠Email: [email protected]
    --------  
    42:53
  • The Man Who Saved the World by Ignoring the Computer | Irreducible Book Club
    If the military had been using AIs in 1983, everyone would be dead. Machines will never be conscious, and that animal instinct saved the world. This is the story:On 26 September 1983, Lieutenant Colonel Stanislav Petrov sat in a Soviet early-warning bunker watching computers tell him that US nuclear missiles were on their way. The data said “launch.” His intuition said “wait.” Petrov chose to override the system and, in doing so, probably saved the world.In this Thinking on Paper Book Club short, Mark and Jeremy use the Petrov story as a live case study for one of Federico Faggin’s core arguments in Irreducible: information is not the same as consciousness.Across a few minutes, they unpack:Why Petrov’s decision shows the gap between mechanical rule-following and conscious judgmentHow “information makes consciousness” sits at the center of Federrio Faggin’s new consciousness theoryWhy AI systems that only flip 1s and 0s can’t replicate intuition or qualia. In other words, why AI will never be conscious. This is a short from our 13-part Book Club on Federico Faggin’s Irreducible.If you’re interested in AI, consciousness, and the limits of information theory, listen to the full episode for more on information, consciousness, and why Faggin thinks consciousness is irreducible. Cheers, Mark and Jeremy.Keep Thinking On Paper. --We like you. Connect with us:⁠Listen to every podcast⁠Follow us on ⁠Instagram⁠Follow us on ⁠X⁠Follow Mark on ⁠LinkedIn⁠Follow Jeremy on ⁠LinkedIn⁠Read our ⁠Substack⁠Email: [email protected]
    --------  
    4:33
  • Don Norman Explains Humanity-Centered Design (and Why Human-Centered Isn’t Enough)
    Don Norman gives the clearest, most accessible explanation of humanity centered design there is. He invented the concept, after all.In this Thinking On Paper short, the Godfather of Design lays out the foundations of why design must expand beyond the individual user and account for society, the planet, and long-term impact. The core idea is simple: designing for individual users is no longer enough. “What’s wrong,” he says, “is what’s left out.” Every digital product relies on a physical product. Power systems, infrastructure, data centers, electricity. You can’t ignore these systems when designing a new product.Designers need to widen their frame. Traditional human-centered overlooks environmental and social consequences.The hidden costs of digital technology show up far from your phone, laptop, car or magic pen.Humanity Centered Design teams work with communities instead of imposing solutions. They focus on long-term impact more than short-term convenience.Efficiency isn’t always a virtue.Simple metrics distort real outcomesResponsible design must consider ecosystemsDon Norman is a legend. He argues that the future of design depends on understanding how products influence society, policy, and the planet, not just usability.The conversation moves from principles to practice: what sustainable design looks like, how to design without repeating “colonial” patterns, and how to build technology that strengthens communities instead of weakening them. “We’re all together,” Norman says, summing up his approach. The responsibility is collective, and so is the impact.Please enjoy the show. And share it with a friend. --Other ways to connect with us:⁠Listen to every podcast⁠Follow us on ⁠Instagram⁠Follow us on ⁠X⁠Follow Mark on ⁠LinkedIn⁠Follow Jeremy on ⁠LinkedIn⁠Read our ⁠Substack⁠Email: [email protected] On YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@thinkingonpaper/videos
    --------  
    6:42

More Business podcasts

About Thinking On Paper

Learn about the impact of AI & TECHNOLOGY from the CEOS, Founders & Outliers spending millions and billions. Our mission is to help ONE MILLION serious professionals ditch their Twitter and LinkedIn feeds and connect the dots of cutting edge technologies for themselves. Former guests:IBM, NASA, Coinbase, D-Wave, Microsoft, Kevin Kelly.
Podcast website

Listen to Thinking On Paper, The Diary Of A CEO with Steven Bartlett and many other podcasts from around the world with the radio.net app

Get the free radio.net app

  • Stations and podcasts to bookmark
  • Stream via Wi-Fi or Bluetooth
  • Supports Carplay & Android Auto
  • Many other app features
Social
v8.0.1 | © 2007-2025 radio.de GmbH
Generated: 11/25/2025 - 7:42:54 AM