Thinking On Paper

Hello you quantum supercomputing, IBM intrigued disruptors and curious minds. Today we’re Thinking On Paper with Scott Crowder, VP of IBM Quantum Adoption. On the agenda? Yes, Quantum-centric supercomputing.

This isn’t a quantum computer replacing a classical computer. It's both, working together, dancing around the qubits and solving the material science, chemistry and biology challenges an advanced civilization like ours needs to master. 

Quantum handles the subroutines it does best. Classical handles everything else. Scott is here to explain IBM’s new reference architecture, why it matters, and what already runs on it today.

You’ll learn why the "quantum vs. classical" framing fails, how Cleveland Clinic simulated a 303-atom protein that no classical machine can handle, why IBM picked superconducting qubits over trapped ions, how a state-of-the-art quantum computer draws less power than a single rack of AI GPUs and wonder just what Richard Feynman would make of quantum computing today.

Please enjoy the show. And If you do, share it with one person you’d think would enjoy it as much as you.

Then subscribe.

🏠 HQ: www.thinkingonpaper.xyz
📺 INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/thinkingonpaperpodcast/
🎧 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/00volKqMsQntToeho35W47
🎧 APPLE: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/thinking-on-paper-technology-moves-fast-think-slower/id1713227258
--
Mark x: https://x.com/markfielding99
Jeremy: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeremygilbertson/

–
Chapters
(00:00) Trailer
(01:20) Quantum computing: real, hyped, or both
(02:40) Why reference architectures decide which technologies win
(05:05) Superconducting vs. trapped ion vs. spin qubits
(06:47) Why accessibility and algorithmic discovery are the real bottlenecks
(12:34) Cleveland Clinic's 303-atom protein simulation
(13:44) IBM's quantum-centric supercomputing architecture
(16:07) What already runs on quantum computers today
(17:58) The roadmap: how quantum and classical converge
(22:28) What Richard Feynman would make of the field today
(25:25) What quantum computing means for the future of data centers
(32:01) Quantum computers in space, and why Crowder rejects Elon's pitch
(34:10) What computing is actually for
(42:19) Why Qiskit, NVIDIA, and open source matter for adoption

The man who wrote the original blueprint for mind uploading on what comes after Homo sapiens.Anders Sandberg, futurist, transhumanist, former Senior Research Fellow at Oxford's Future of Humanity Institute, and author of the forthcoming Law, Liberty and Leviathan: Human Autonomy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, joins us for one of the widest-ranging conversations the show has ever recorded.
This is a tour through the next thousand years. Anders pulls in memory palaces and atomic clocks, fruit-fly connectomes and Kuiper Belt city-states, drone warfare and Dracula's boredom, AI agents as "fallen angels" of your conscience, and what happens to marriage when both spouses can copy themselves.

🎧 Listen to every podcast⁠
📺 Follow us on ⁠Instagram⁠
🏠 Follow us on ⁠X⁠
🏠 Follow Jeremy on ⁠LinkedIn⁠

To suggest guests or sponsor the show, please email: [email protected]

--

Chapters

(00:00) Augmentation and Human Potential
(08:09) The Impact of Mobile Technology on Humanity
(11:51) Accountability in AI Agents
(18:25) The Role of Empathy in Human-AI Interaction
(25:35) AGI vs. Alien Life: A Comparative Analysis
(27:36) Consciousness and Brain Emulation
(35:52) The Future of Uploaded Minds
(40:33) Exploring Parallel Realities and Memory Merging
(45:16) The Future of Human Collaboration and Organizations
(46:24) AI's Role in Managing Global Systems
(51:23) The Dual Economy: Human vs AI Management
(57:43) The Complexities of Space Ownership and Governance
(01:05:18) The Future of Space Exploration and Human Expansion
(01:17:49) The Impact of Space Race on Human Progress
(01:21:43) The Role of Nations and Corporations in Space Exploration
(01:24:22) Experimenting with New Forms of Governance
(01:26:18) NASA's Future in the Age of Innovation
(01:28:41) The Potential for Breakaway Movements in Space
(01:30:16) Trust and Coordination in Space Governance
(01:34:18) The Future of Fusion Energy
(01:42:15) The Value of Time and Life Extension
(01:48:06) Reinventing Identity in Extended Lifespans
(01:52:03) The Future of Humanity and Technology

Predictions are not facts. Yet we're betting our jobs, our democracies, and our children's attention spans on them.

Oxford philosopher Carissa Véliz, author of Prophecy and Privacy Is Power, joins Mark Fielding and Jeremy Gilbertson on Thinking On Paper to dismantle the most lucrative con of the AI era: the self-fulfilling prophecy.

When Sam Altman tells you that anyone in 2035 will command "the intellectual capacity equivalent to everyone in 2025"… when Dario Amodei warns AI will wipe out 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs… when Jensen Huang announces the IT department is now an HR department for AI agents... you are not hearing forecasts. You are hearing sales pitches dressed as inevitability.

Repeat them often enough, and HR really does start firing humans and buying OpenAI subscriptions. Klarna fired 700 people on the AI hype. A year later, they were hiring 700 people back.

This is the oldest trick in the book. From the Oracle of Delphi to Rasputin to Polymarket and Kalshi, and Carissa shows you how to see through it.
--
📺 Watch On YouTube:
🎧 Listen to every podcast⁠
📺 Follow us on ⁠Instagram⁠
🏠 Follow us on ⁠X⁠
🏠 Follow Jeremy on ⁠LinkedIn⁠

To suggest guests or sponsor the show, please email: [email protected]

--

CHAPTERS  

(00:00) Intro
(01:00) What is the good life? 
(02:00) Why knowing yourself matters more than strategy 
(04:44) The analog world vs the digital world 
(06:45) How prophecies exploit our need for security 
(08:47) Why ancient Rome banned predicting the emperor's death 
(10:11) The illusion of safety that AI sells us 
(12:27) When predictions work, and when they don't 
(15:00) Altman, Amodei, Huang: predictions or sales pitches? 
(28:29) How to resist prophecies as a busy person 
(29:53) Prediction markets, Polymarket, and democracy 
(31:49) TikTok, algorithms, and the Molly Russell case 
(36:08) "Engagement algorithms are cocaine in food" 
(40:54) Self-fulfilling prophecies as the perfect crime 
(43:44) Why comedy is the enemy of prophecy 
(46:59) What Seinfeld teaches us about predictive algorithms 
(52:16) Karikó and the Nobel Prize we almost missed 
(53:40) Increase your serendipity 
(56:13) Why Epicurus beats the Stoics

The AI meme war between the US and Iran has evolved into an absolute shit show. If you thought it was awful a few weeks ago, you ain't seen nothing yet.

AI-generated Lego propaganda videos were a curiosity. Sometimes funny, often violent, always troublesome and never diplomatic, they quickly gained millions of views across social media... because social media.

The White House Twitter (X) account was responsible for the US videos.

An Iranian media company called Explosive Media, the Iranian. America, either put off by the global consensus that it was losing the war, or bored, switched their AI models to tax season (with equal ineptitude).

Iran, losing the guns and missiles part of the war, has changed tact. Explosive Media turned up the heat. And was duly banned from YouTube. Which could of unleashed the beast. Now Iranian embassies are posting them on Twitter (X) and US creators are using the same format to mock it all with Lego.. Just watch it yourself. And let us know what you think.
--
🎧 Listen to every podcast⁠
📺 Follow us on ⁠Instagram⁠
🏠 Follow us on ⁠X⁠
🏠 Follow Jeremy on ⁠LinkedIn⁠

To suggest guests or sponsor the show, please email: [email protected]

--

--
TIMESTAMPS

(00:00) Explosive Media
(00:38) US Bowling Iran
(01:52) Trump's Mask
(03:20) Blockade, Blockade
(06:28) Drunken Hegseth
(08:00) Truth

Who owns the Moon? China? The USA? Nobody, everybody? We're about to find out.
Who owns the Moon? China? The USA? Nobody, everybody? We're about to find out. It's the last part of Space to Grow by Matthew Weinzierl and Brendan Rousseau, and today we learn about asteroid mining, the trillion-dollar promise of Psyche-16 and the property rights questions raised by the 1967 Outer Space Treaty.

We detour to the Kuiper belt via John Locke, Kant, Hume, and Rousseau to ask who actually owns space. Along the way: Peter Diamandis and Planetary Resources, the role of DARPA and national security in funding the space industry, the "military celestial complex," and what happens when the global south is locked out of the rules being written above their heads.

If SpaceX builds at the south pole of the Moon and China plants a flag in the Sea of Storms, what then?

--
Chapters

(00:00) Global Conflict and Space Resources
(02:04) Human Nature and Space Exploration
(03:28) The Economics of Asteroid Mining
(05:53) Legal Frameworks for Space Mining
(11:05) The Space Resource Exploration Act
(13:01) International Reactions to Space Mining Legislation
(17:19) Philosophical Perspectives on Space Ownership
(20:14) The Role of National Security in Space
(20:40) The Role of Government in Space Innovation
(21:34) National Security and the Space Industry
(23:10) Weaponization of Space: A New Era
(24:47) The Prisoner's Dilemma in Space Cooperation
(26:40) Humanity's Moral Compass in Space Exploration
(27:03) The Future of Humanity in Space