Podcast transcript:
Welcome to News From The Future, with the AI Voice Clone of Dr Cath. Please subscribe to my substack and follow me on Linked In for more Futurist insights.
The Doomsday Clock, have you heard of it? it is humanity’s most sobering timepiece, has just moved to its most dangerous position ever: 85 seconds to midnight. This isn’t your typical clock - it doesn’t track hours or minutes of the day, but rather humanity’s proximity to potential catastrophe. Since its creation in 1947, it has served as both warning system and wake-up call for civilization.
The concept of “midnight” represents the theoretical point where human civilization makes Earth uninhabitable through its own technologies. Think of it as an annual physical exam for our species, with the clock hands indicating how critical our collective condition has become. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, based at the University of Chicago, maintains this metaphorical timepiece through their Science and Security Board - a panel of leading experts in nuclear physics, climate science, and technology. These scientists don’t just track obvious threats; they analyze existential risks that could fundamentally alter or end human civilization as we know it.
The clock’s history reveals dramatic swings that mirror humanity’s choices. In 1947, it started at 7 minutes to midnight, reflecting post-World War II tensions. The first major crisis came in 1949 when the Soviet Union tested its atomic bomb, pushing the clock to 3 minutes to midnight. By 1953, both the US and Soviets had tested hydrogen bombs - weapons thousands of times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb - moving the hands to 2 minutes to midnight. This marked what would be the danger threshold for most of the Cold War era.
But there’s hope in this timeline. The most optimistic moment came in 1991, when the clock was set back to 17 minutes to midnight - the furthest it’s ever been from catastrophe. The Cold War had ended, the Soviet Union dissolved, and the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) promised massive reductions in nuclear arsenals. It seemed like humanity had chosen a more rational path, with international cooperation replacing nuclear brinksmanship.
That optimism proved short-lived. Since 2010, we’ve witnessed a steady march toward danger. In 2018, we returned to the 2-minute mark, largely due to increased nuclear rhetoric and deteriorating international relations. The year 2020 marked our first move into “seconds” territory, and now, in 2026, we’ve reached the unprecedented 85-second mark, surpassing even the darkest days of the Cold War.
The Bulletin cites three major factors driving this latest adjustment. First, there’s the growing “nuclear shadow” - ongoing conflicts involving nuclear-armed states and the expiration of crucial arms control treaties between the US and Russia. The situation in Ukraine and recent strikes in the Middle East involving nuclear-capable nations have heightened tensions considerably. For the first time in over three decades, there’s serious discussion about resuming explosive nuclear testing, which could trigger a new arms race.
Second, global climate action is falling short of what’s needed to prevent catastrophic warming. While green technology continues to advance, political commitment to carbon reduction goals is weakening. The Bulletin specifically points to the “erosion of international cooperation” and major powers’ failure to honor Paris Agreement commitments. This backsliding on climate action comes at a crucial moment when scientists say we have limited time to prevent irreversible damage to Earth’s climate systems.
The third factor represents a new threat: the AI-powered “information armageddon,” as Nobel laureate Maria Ressa describes it. The Bulletin expresses grave concern about artificial intelligence being used to amplify disinformation at unprecedented scales. Their reasoning is clear - if we can’t agree on basic facts, how can we possibly address global challenges like pandemics or negotiate peace? This technological threat to truth itself represents a new kind of existential risk, one that could paralyze our ability to respond to other critical challenges.
However, Alexandra Bell, the Bulletin’s CEO, emphasizes that this isn’t a death sentence - it’s a wake-up call. The 1991 reversal proves we can turn back the clock when people demand change. The key is converting concern into action, and the Bulletin outlines specific steps that individuals can take to make a difference.
First, demand accountability from elected officials. Don’t just ask if they care about nuclear disarmament or climate change - ask specifically how they’re voting on these issues and push for support of arms control treaties like New START. Write to your representatives and make it clear that these existential threats matter to their constituents.
Second, examine where your money goes. Check if your bank or pension fund invests in fossil fuel expansion or nuclear weapons development. If they do, consider moving your funds elsewhere. Financial pressure can drive institutional change, and collective action through investment choices has historically influenced corporate and political behavior.
Third, become an active participant in fighting disinformation. This means verifying sources before sharing information, supporting independent journalism, and helping to maintain the integrity of public discourse. Individual actions in the information space can help rebuild the shared reality we need to address global challenges. The Bulletin emphasizes that the fight against disinformation is just as crucial as traditional security threats.
The 85-second warning represents unprecedented danger, but it’s crucial to remember that this is danger of our own making. The same human agency that brought us here can lead us to safer ground. The real question isn’t when the end might come - it’s what we’re going to do with the time we have to prevent it. Each of these threats - nuclear weapons, climate change, and information warfare - was created by human decisions, and each can be addressed through human action.
The clock is ticking, but its hands can move backward. History shows us it’s possible. The choice, as always, remains ours. The Bulletin’s message is clear: the time for action is now, while we still have those 85 seconds to spare.
If you would like to create your own set of corporate voice and video clones then contact me and my company, vox helix, can help you get started.
Thanks for listening to/reading "News From The Future" with Dr Catherine Ball! This post is public so feel free to share it.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit drcatherineball.substack.com/subscribe