The Nova Society

Do you have a question or comment? Want to suggest a topic for our panel or be a guest on the Nova Society? Send us a message!
Today, we are pleased to speak with our guest, Jen Thompson.
Jen Thompson is a former high-powered Republican strategist and congressional lawyer who famously walked away from Washington at the peak of her career. She managed the nationally watched 2002 campaign that tipped the divided U.S. Senate back to Republican control, overcoming a massive campaign deficit by orchestrating high-profile events with the President of the United States. Alongside her political work, she served as a lawyer-lobbyist at top international law firms and spent eight years as a chief political commentator for NBC and ABC news affiliates in Richmond, Virginia. 
However, a near-fatal car accident on the campaign trail served as the ultimate catalyst for change, forcing her to reckon with the heavy toll of her fabricated political identity. Turning down highly coveted job offers in the White House and the U.S. Senate, Thompson walked away from her political power to accept a visiting professorship at the University of Melbourne in Australia. 
This radical physical pivot sparked an even deeper ideological transformation. Once a champion of conservative platforms, Thompson underwent a complete political shift in the years that followed. Confronting her own white privilege and the realities of systemic racism, she embraced anti-racist work following the 2014 protests in Ferguson, Missouri. She also fundamentally changed her stance on reproductive rights after a life-threatening pregnancy required her to have an abortion to save her own life. Today, she openly acknowledges her departure from the party she once helped build, noting that she has not voted for a Republican candidate since 2015. 
Thompson now serves as a Chief of Staff at the University of Redlands in California and writes a popular Substack newsletter about authenticity, grace, and navigating major life transitions. She has been widely quoted in major media outlets, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Chicago Tribune. Her debut memoir, Wild Pivot: Notes from a Political Life Rewritten, will be released and distributed by Simon & Schuster in September 2026. 
Support the show
The Nova Society Podcast 
In season 5, we will transition to 3 episodes per week and expand episode lengths for more in-depth conversations.
Stay tuned for more information about our proposed weekly second channel, The Nova Society-Side Projects, where we have conversations with guests about topics important to them and to you, our listeners.

Our Buzzsprout Home Landing Page
Direct SMS message to the podcast from the “message us” link on our page.

Support the Nova Society
Email us your Questions
Subscribe to the Nova Society

Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Join Our Facebook Page & YouTube Channel
Past episodes & read our blog Here.

JCIS

Apple Podcasts/ I-Tunes   
Spotify 
...

Do you have a question or comment? Want to suggest a topic for our panel or be a guest on the Nova Society? Send us a message!
Heiner, from Berlin, Germany writes,  

Unless anyone was wondering, there is very little public support here for President Trump’s war in Iran, and by all accounts, Americans are growing even less supportive as the conflict drags on with no clear end in sight.  

During wartime, my countrymen and I understand the need for strategic secrecy; you’ve mentioned this many times on the podcast. But we’re now seeing increasing coverage questioning U.S. armament levels and the depletion of American stockpiles.  

Even acknowledging that the true state of U.S. weapons reserves is obscured by the fog of war, some of President Trump’s recent moves have caught my attention. He threatens major strikes, then abruptly backs off. He pivots from military escalation to talk of “total economic strangulation” as the primary tool of pressure.  

So, here’s my question to the panel: Is this shift toward economic warfare a signal that U.S. weapons stockpiles may be in worse condition than many assume? Is the administration recalibrating strategy because the military toolbox is more limited than officials are willing to publicly admit?  If America has weakened itself by engaging in this stupid war, how vulnerable do you think America is?  How vulnerable is Europe to Russian aggression if America can’t even muster the weapons necessary to end the war in Iran? And what about the rest of the world? Is China looking on and planning something?      
Support the show
The Nova Society Podcast 
In season 5, we will transition to 3 episodes per week and expand episode lengths for more in-depth conversations.
Stay tuned for more information about our proposed weekly second channel, The Nova Society-Side Projects, where we have conversations with guests about topics important to them and to you, our listeners.

Our Buzzsprout Home Landing Page
Direct SMS message to the podcast from the “message us” link on our page.

Support the Nova Society
Email us your Questions
Subscribe to the Nova Society

Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Join Our Facebook Page & YouTube Channel
Past episodes & read our blog Here.

JCIS

Apple Podcasts/ I-Tunes   
Spotify 
...

Do you have a question or comment? Want to suggest a topic for our panel or be a guest on the Nova Society? Send us a message!
Mark from Tampa, Florida writes:
Prime Minister Netanyahu has now publicly rejected Trump’s 15‑point plan, and watching the video, the dismissal looked like a direct and unmistakable rebuke. It raises real questions about the effectiveness and relevance of Trump’s “Board of Peace,” especially at a moment when American support for Israel is showing signs of strain and the war with Iran is beginning to resemble a long, grinding conflict with no clear end.
So, here’s what I’d like the panel to consider: Is this a strategic miscalculation by Netanyahu and Israel? Do they truly have the luxury of openly rejecting a proposal from one of their most important, and increasingly unpredictable, allies?
And more broadly, what does this public break signal about the future of U.S.–Israel relations, especially as both countries navigate a volatile regional war and shifting political landscapes at home? 
Support the show
The Nova Society Podcast 
In season 5, we will transition to 3 episodes per week and expand episode lengths for more in-depth conversations.
Stay tuned for more information about our proposed weekly second channel, The Nova Society-Side Projects, where we have conversations with guests about topics important to them and to you, our listeners.

Our Buzzsprout Home Landing Page
Direct SMS message to the podcast from the “message us” link on our page.

Support the Nova Society
Email us your Questions
Subscribe to the Nova Society

Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Join Our Facebook Page & YouTube Channel
Past episodes & read our blog Here.

JCIS

Apple Podcasts/ I-Tunes   
Spotify 
...

Do you have a question or comment? Want to suggest a topic for our panel or be a guest on the Nova Society? Send us a message!
 Henry from Toledo, Ohio writes:  
Representative Max Miller says he intends to stay in his House race despite being accused of sexual abuse by his ex‑wife and despite Republicans publicly calling for him to step down.  But the filing deadline has passed, and the party is now effectively stuck with him on the ballot. 
Most people would assume Miller is headed for a rough election, even in a ruby‑red district.  
So, my question to the panel is this: If Miller actually wins, what does that say about Ohio’s 7th District and the electorate more broadly? What do voters overlook, tolerate, or rationalize in moments like this?  And second, why do you think Miller chose to stay in the race? Did he calculate that in a party willing to nominate Trump, the boundaries of what is politically disqualifying have shifted so dramatically that almost anything goes now?
Support the show
The Nova Society Podcast 
In season 5, we will transition to 3 episodes per week and expand episode lengths for more in-depth conversations.
Stay tuned for more information about our proposed weekly second channel, The Nova Society-Side Projects, where we have conversations with guests about topics important to them and to you, our listeners.

Our Buzzsprout Home Landing Page
Direct SMS message to the podcast from the “message us” link on our page.

Support the Nova Society
Email us your Questions
Subscribe to the Nova Society

Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Join Our Facebook Page & YouTube Channel
Past episodes & read our blog Here.

JCIS

Apple Podcasts/ I-Tunes   
Spotify 
...

Do you have a question or comment? Want to suggest a topic for our panel or be a guest on the Nova Society? Send us a message!
Robby, from Melbourne, Australia writes,  
You all must be getting dizzy over there in America. Every day feels like Groundhog Day, the same cycle repeating itself.  
The war is supposedly won. Their capabilities are destroyed. Then suddenly we’re bombing again. More service members are hurt. We’re talking. We have a deal. Then we don’t have a deal. 
One minute it’s “We’ll respond forcefully,” the next it’s “Never mind, we’re stepping back.” At this point, does anyone actually know what’s going on?  
Here in Australia, it’s almost become a running joke. You can’t walk into a pub without someone shaking their head at the sheer dysfunction in Washington. And I’m not talking about one person, I mean the government as a whole. The executive branch lurches from one position to another, and Congress seems unable to assert any coherent strategy. People here genuinely wonder how American public confidence in its leadership remains as high as it does.
Meanwhile, Australia has stayed almost entirely silent throughout this conflict. Our priority is economic stability. We favor diplomacy, we avoid escalation, and we have no intention of sending troops.  
You’ve talked a lot about diplomacy on past episodes, but I want to float an idea. If Middle Eastern partners aren’t making progress, is it time to look beyond the usual mediators? What if China, Japan, and Australia took the lead in negotiations? Could a coalition of major Asia‑Pacific powers produce better results? Would the United States even accept that kind of arrangement? And if it did, given the volatility of American decision‑making right now, would it make any difference?
You often say the U.S. needs an exit strategy, but from the outside it looks like every potential off‑ramp gets burned the moment it appears. So is Washington actually trying to get out of this conflict, or is it stuck in a cycle it no longer knows how to break?
Support the show
The Nova Society Podcast 
In season 5, we will transition to 3 episodes per week and expand episode lengths for more in-depth conversations.
Stay tuned for more information about our proposed weekly second channel, The Nova Society-Side Projects, where we have conversations with guests about topics important to them and to you, our listeners.

Our Buzzsprout Home Landing Page
Direct SMS message to the podcast from the “message us” link on our page.

Support the Nova Society
Email us your Questions
Subscribe to the Nova Society

Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Join Our Facebook Page & YouTube Channel
Past episodes & read our blog Here.

JCIS

Apple Podcasts/ I-Tunes   
Spotify 
...