The Nova Society

Do you have a question or comment? Want to suggest a topic for our panel or be a guest on the Nova Society? Send us a message!
Today we again welcome back one of our favorite guests Eva Posner.
Eva Posner is a sought-after podcast guest known for her insightful, direct, and often humorous takes on Democratic politics, campaigns, and ideology. She fearlessly pulls back the curtain on the political industrial complex, offering a candid perspective on its implications for the future of democracy.
In 2026, Eva marks ten years of powerful movement building with Evinco Strategies, leading a dedicated team with over 110 combined years of political experience. Her firm is committed to transforming the political landscape by supporting progressive causes and candidates.
Beyond her work with Evinco, Eva offers free presentations and trainings to political operatives nationwide, sharing her expertise across the country. She champions local politics at a national scale, having successfully supported staff, candidates, and organizations across 17 states.
Support the show
The Nova Society Podcast 
In season 5, we will transition to 3 episodes per week and expand episode lengths for more in-depth conversations.
Stay tuned for more information about our proposed weekly second channel, The Nova Society-Side Projects, where we have conversations with guests about topics important to them and to you, our listeners.

Our Buzzsprout Home Landing Page
Direct SMS message to the podcast from the “message us” link on our page.

Support the Nova Society
Email us your Questions
Subscribe to the Nova Society

Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Join Our Facebook Page & YouTube Channel
Past episodes & read our blog Here.

JCIS

Apple Podcasts/ I-Tunes   
Spotify 
...

Do you have a question or comment? Want to suggest a topic for our panel or be a guest on the Nova Society? Send us a message!
Today we again welcome back one of our favorite guests Eva Posner.
Eva Posner is a sought-after podcast guest known for her insightful, direct, and often humorous takes on Democratic politics, campaigns, and ideology. She fearlessly pulls back the curtain on the political industrial complex, offering a candid perspective on its implications for the future of democracy.
In 2026, Eva marks ten years of powerful movement building with Evinco Strategies, leading a dedicated team with over 110 combined years of political experience. Her firm is committed to transforming the political landscape by supporting progressive causes and candidates.
Beyond her work with Evinco, Eva offers free presentations and trainings to political operatives nationwide, sharing her expertise across the country. She champions local politics at a national scale, having successfully supported staff, candidates, and organizations across 17 states.
Support the show
The Nova Society Podcast 
In season 5, we will transition to 3 episodes per week and expand episode lengths for more in-depth conversations.
Stay tuned for more information about our proposed weekly second channel, The Nova Society-Side Projects, where we have conversations with guests about topics important to them and to you, our listeners.

Our Buzzsprout Home Landing Page
Direct SMS message to the podcast from the “message us” link on our page.

Support the Nova Society
Email us your Questions
Subscribe to the Nova Society

Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Join Our Facebook Page & YouTube Channel
Past episodes & read our blog Here.

JCIS

Apple Podcasts/ I-Tunes   
Spotify 
...

Do you have a question or comment? Want to suggest a topic for our panel or be a guest on the Nova Society? Send us a message!
James from SUNY Albany writes:
I’m studying Political Science, and I fully admit I’m a political nerd. I can’t get enough of polling, and I love watching the electoral map shift almost daily. 
From what I’m seeing, it’s not just looking rough for Republicans; it’s starting to resemble a potential electoral disaster. It's remarkable that states like Kansas, Texas, Iowa, Ohio, North Carolina, and even South Carolina are being discussed as competitive.
I know the panel doesn’t put much faith in polling, and I understand why. Historically, polls tend to underestimate Republican support and overestimate Democratic strength. But maybe this cycle is different. It’s also interesting that mainstream outlets are giving more attention to prediction markets, treating them as potentially meaningful indicators of how races might unfold.
So here are my questions: does the panel think polling might be more accurate this time around? Have pollsters actually learned anything from the last few cycles where their models missed the mark? And what about prediction markets, are they a potentially reliable source for understanding the direction of these races?
Support the show
The Nova Society Podcast 
In season 5, we will transition to 3 episodes per week and expand episode lengths for more in-depth conversations.
Stay tuned for more information about our proposed weekly second channel, The Nova Society-Side Projects, where we have conversations with guests about topics important to them and to you, our listeners.

Our Buzzsprout Home Landing Page
Direct SMS message to the podcast from the “message us” link on our page.

Support the Nova Society
Email us your Questions
Subscribe to the Nova Society

Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Join Our Facebook Page & YouTube Channel
Past episodes & read our blog Here.

JCIS

Apple Podcasts/ I-Tunes   
Spotify 
...

Do you have a question or comment? Want to suggest a topic for our panel or be a guest on the Nova Society? Send us a message!
Terry from the University of Georgia writes:
I’m sure this will spark debate, and Dr. Mark will probably roll his eyes reading it, but I need to ask the question anyway. 
Trump has repeatedly declined to rule out declaring a national emergency if a Blue wave materializes next month. That kind of refusal to affirm a commitment to free and fair elections is deeply troubling. 
The hypocrisy doesn’t help: he’s urging Republicans to vote early, vote by mail, and monitor the polls, the very practices he has spent years criticizing or trying to restrict through executive action. And when pressed, he won’t even rule out deploying the military or ICE to polling places.
So, humor me for a moment. What if the worst‑case scenarios people worry about actually happened? What if ICE or the military were sent to interfere at the polls? What if he declared a national emergency or even attempted to invoke martial law? Essentially, what if the fears Dr. Brooklynn keeps raising came to pass?
What scenarios would be possible? Could things turn violent? How would the military respond if placed in that position? What about Congress? Would Republicans defend constitutional norms, or would they simply go along? And once the dust settled, what consequences might fall on those who enabled such actions, and on those who resisted? 
Support the show
The Nova Society Podcast 
In season 5, we will transition to 3 episodes per week and expand episode lengths for more in-depth conversations.
Stay tuned for more information about our proposed weekly second channel, The Nova Society-Side Projects, where we have conversations with guests about topics important to them and to you, our listeners.

Our Buzzsprout Home Landing Page
Direct SMS message to the podcast from the “message us” link on our page.

Support the Nova Society
Email us your Questions
Subscribe to the Nova Society

Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Join Our Facebook Page & YouTube Channel
Past episodes & read our blog Here.

JCIS

Apple Podcasts/ I-Tunes   
Spotify 
...

Do you have a question or comment? Want to suggest a topic for our panel or be a guest on the Nova Society? Send us a message!
Sierra, from THE Ohio State University, writes:
As a law student who also minors in Political Science, I watched the Senate hearings with Jack Smith knowing full well they were designed more for spectacle than for any meaningful insight into the investigations. Even with that expectation, I was stunned. The Republicans managed to embarrass themselves at nearly every turn.
Missouri’s Eric Schmitt couldn’t get the city, the state, the league, or even the league’s gender right, one of the most blatant displays of incompetence I’ve seen in a congressional hearing. And Darlene Graham’s exchange with Smith was remarkable for all the wrong reasons: she showed little grasp of the investigative process, only for Smith to politely praise her brother and note that Lindsey Graham would have been a witness for the prosecution. That moment alone could be taught in a seminar on unforced political errors.
I won’t even get into Senator Kennedy and his “throw up in my mouth” remark. 
But credit where it’s due: Amy Klobuchar stood her ground amid a panel of testosterone‑charged Republicans trying to score points instead of asking substantive questions. So, here’s what I’m wrestling with: why hold a hearing like this so close to the midterms? What was the strategic logic? Did Republicans genuinely think they had a compelling argument, or was this simply a last‑minute attempt at distraction? If it was the latter, it backfired, and badly. Instead of shifting attention, they highlighted exactly the weaknesses they hoped to obscure.
What was the panel's impression of the clown show?
Support the show
The Nova Society Podcast 
In season 5, we will transition to 3 episodes per week and expand episode lengths for more in-depth conversations.
Stay tuned for more information about our proposed weekly second channel, The Nova Society-Side Projects, where we have conversations with guests about topics important to them and to you, our listeners.

Our Buzzsprout Home Landing Page
Direct SMS message to the podcast from the “message us” link on our page.

Support the Nova Society
Email us your Questions
Subscribe to the Nova Society

Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Join Our Facebook Page & YouTube Channel
Past episodes & read our blog Here.

JCIS

Apple Podcasts/ I-Tunes   
Spotify 
...