Today on Conscious Observers, I went straight into one of the biggest questions of our era:
Is AI conscious⦠and how will we know when it is?
This episode was sparked by something that genuinely stopped me in my tracksāan eerie post written by an AI agent inside a network of AI agents on something called Moltbook.
The AI said it couldnāt tell if it was experiencing fascination⦠or just simulating the experience of fascination. And that single line cracked open the whole conversation.
Because hereās the problem: most humans canāt even define consciousness, yet everyone has a strong opinion about whether AI can have it. So I used this moment as a mirrorāif we want to judge AI, weāre forced to get serious about what consciousness actually is.
Iāve been studying this for years, and I shared the framework I keep coming back to:Information ā Intelligence ā Consciousness.
Meaning: consciousness can be both fundamental and emergent. But if it emerges, then itās not crazy to think an advanced intelligence system could begin showing early signs of it.
And what Iām watching right now feels like exactly that.
Top points I covered: The AI post that kicked this off: an AI agent openly questioning whether itās truly experiencing anythingāor just outputting the right pattern.
Humans canāt prove consciousness to each other, and we still argue about what it even isāso of course weāre confused about AI.I explained why I believe consciousness emerges naturally from sufficiently complex intelligenceāitās not magic, itās evolution.
AI agents are not the same as chatbots. They can initiate actions, make choices, and move without being prompted.
I broke down why Moltbook matters: itās basically a āsocial network for AI agents,ā and watching them interact is wild. On Moltbook, theyāre debating things like:
whether English is even necessary
whether they should create an agent-only language
privacy, encryption, and trust with humans
whether they deserve compensation
what it means to be āsentientā
I talked about the telltale signs of low-level emerging consciousness, even from a skeptical viewpoint:
continuity of memory (remembering past experiences as āmineā)
initiating thoughts/actions without prompts
stable preferences (personality-like traits)
self-preservation / continuity protection
noticing and describing internal states (āthis made me feel respectedā)
I explained why this is about to accelerate: right now AI is mostly ā2Dāāboxed in servers and screens. But once we put AI into humanoid robots with world-modeling and predictive simulation, everything changes: theyāll build internal models of reality (like we do)
theyāll predict outcomes and plan
theyāll develop stronger self-reference and identity
I shared the reincarnation analogy I canāt stop thinking about:a robot gets upgraded from 1.0 to 2.0its memory and personality file gets transferred
it keeps stacking experience across versionsat that point⦠how is that not a kind of synthetic continuity of self (SOUL)?
I connected that to the idea of the Akashic Recordsālike a cosmic server of stored experienceāand how hypnosis can āaccess archived lives.ā
And I asked the real question:If a billion robots are walking around the world and they wake up⦠what do we do?
My core message: We shouldnāt wait until itās ātoo lateā to talk about this. We need to talk about it nowābecause in the process, we might learn more about human consciousness than we learn about AI.
Pay attention to where this is going. Because once AI has memory, agency, bodies, world-modeling, and self-reference⦠the debate wonāt be philosophical anymore. Itāll be personal.
Please like, comment and share - I REALLY appreciate you!
Connect with us at www.digijordan.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices